David,
Why? It seems logical that the car is “hanging” from the wires so why
wouldn’t the weight be born by the “top” of the knock off? As for the
planetary tightenening effect I agree with you that will happen, as you
mention, no matter what type of wheels are in use. So it’s not
important where where the load is, just that its there.
pauls 67ots sans timing
Giving this just a little more thought, it seems completely logical that
the
most important part of the theorem is the interaction between the wheel
and
the knock-off, where they meet. It makes more sense to think of the
wheel
cone and the knockoff as planetary wheels rather than planetary
gears.
Forward motion of the car causes the wheels to drive the knockoffs until
they can’t tighten anymore. But it otherwise has nothing to do with the
construction of the wheel itself - wire wheels could just as well be
alloy -
the key is the knockoff/wheel interface.
…I conducted an experiment today. I loosened one knock-off by one
spoke,
marked the new location with a permanent marker, then took the car for a
short drive. On return, the knockoff had moved in the direction of
tightening by 1/2 spoke. So, I now think that the weight of the car
rests
on the bottom of the knock-off, not the top, and the planetary wheel
concept drives the knock-off in the direction of tightening because the
hub/wheel endeavour to rotate faster than the knockoff.
Thoughts?
David
<<<<<<<<<<From: “David J. Shield” dshield@pacbell.net
Subject: RE: RE: [E-Type] Re: E-Type tube-tubeless