Part 2…
These STEVENSON Telescopic Jacks (1936-1960) were covered by Patents around a basic concept of the telescopic Jacking mechanism, which could be customised to suit a large range of different makes and models of cars and trucks…, with three main customising variables…
- The overall LENGTH of the main telescopic Tube and its internal screwing mechanism. There was four or five different standard Lengths were available.
- The LIFTING ARM detail, including its position on the main Tube. The Lifting Arm was available in a variety of very different bespoke designs - each design being to specifically suit the requirements of the particular make and model of car for which the Jack was to be supplied for.
- The DRIVE arrangement. At the very top of the main screw within the main telescopic tube, there was the option of several different DRIVE arrangements, including simple Hexagon nuts (of different AF dimension) or more elaborate fixed or folding crank handles. Again the exact type of DRIVE was as specified for each particular make/model of car that the Jack was to be supplied for (pardon the poor grammar )
Now in SS and Jaguars case - these three customising variations were specified to suit exactly the requirements of SS Jaguar, SS100, Mark IV, Mark V, XK120, XK140 and XK150, and it should be noted, the combination of Jaguars requirements were unique, and not shared by any other make/model of car that also used these STEVENSON telescopic Jacks.
With SS cars and Jaguars cars, Jaguar produced Engineering Drawings that for each combination of these 3 customising variations, they allocated a unique Jaguar Part Number. Jenks, then Smiths, then BTC, then Prima supplied new Jacks to Jaguar, in accordance with Jaguars Engineering Drawings for each unique Part Number. I call these Contract Drawings as they only specify critical dimensions and features - but they are not fully detailed manufacturing drawings, as they merely a means to ensure accuracy to a top level Part Number interchangeability/functional accuracy. In SS Cars and Jaguars case all Jacks supplied over the 1936MY to 1960 period came in only some five different Part Numbers as follows…
- 1390 (with three variations) - for all 1936 to 1939MY SS Jaguar.
- C.204/A for 1940MY SS Jaguar, and also all Mark IV 1945-1949
- C.2654 for early 1949 only Mark V
- C.2953 for later 1949/51 Mark V and all XK120, all XK140 and earlier XK150 to Dec 1959
- C.16392 for later XK150 from Dec 1959 to last in 1960.
Now as above, these five Part Numbers only represent differences in functional/dimensional/interchangeability aspects - including the three customizing variations that are required from the then manufacturer (Jenks, Smiths, BTC, Prima) and does not cover/mention branding, cosmetic, patent feature, manufacturing etc evolving characteristics as they changed over the 1936 to 1960 period.
But of specific interest is the C.2953 Jack as supplied from 1949 to 1959, to late Mark V, all XK120, all XK140 and earlier XK150 to Dec 1959.
Those who just want a Jack that will function/work as per a C.2953, but are looking to modify a similar/but different Stevenson Telescopic Jack as supplied to some other manufacture/model other than Jaguar, are mostly concerned about the three customising variations. Those who want a C2953 that is authentically the same as originally supplied to their particular age 1949 to 1959 XK120/140/earlier 150 need to know also all the relevant branding, cosmetic, and manufacturing variations that evolved over the 1949 to 1959 period of part number C2953 Jacks… AS a heads up, my research and conclusions, identify some eight major variations to the C2953 Jack, that I identify (my system) as VARIANTS C.2953**/a**, C.2953**/b**, C.2953**/c** etc up to C.2953**/h**, noting that during the 1949 to 1954 XK120 period you will find C2953**/a**, /b and /c variant Jacks only.
Next Part 3 - I will detail the three customizing variations that matter to those wanting to modify a non Jaguar Stevenson telescopic Jack into one that functions/works as per an XK120 C2953 Jack, but doesn’t otherwise care about cosmetic/branding/manufacturing authenticity…