From the That’s-Not-Good Department™: The Jaguar I-Pace has finally received its official mpg and range numbers: 234 miles on a 90kWh battery. The mpg equivalent numbers for the car is:
80 MPGe City
72 MPGe Highway
76 MPGe Combined
The bad news: That’s really not good at all, compared to the competition.
The good news: At least now we’re at a point where we think a range of 234 miles is not all that.
Still, more than enough for most people’s commutes.
My hypothesis is that Electric Cars totally reliant on heavy and environmentally disastrous battery technology and electric power generation, will never be a mass transit solution, but will remain little more than a ‘feel good’ toy for accommodating buyers, and will remain a useful political stop-gap solution, until a viable and actual environmentally friendly solution is found. My best bet is hydrogen or fuel-cell technology is the only current potential genuine solution, and indeed viable prototype cars are already being manufactured by a number of car companies, and being looked at by many others.
Electric cars are an environmental disaster, if you consider the ‘whole-of-life’ environmental impact - worse than conventional petrol IC engined cars. There sole benefit, is limiting high density city-centre pollution, at the huge expense of adverse environmental impact in their manufacture, electricity generation, ongoing maintenance (battery life is pathetic), and eventual scrapping elsewhere.
Looks like a good read Paul – will absorb when I get a chance.
When in the office – before retiring – there was comment about another US University Thesis, re Whole-of-Life Environmental comparison of Hummer H2 versus Toyota Prius.
The next bit of info needed, is what differences from that number are going to be load dependent, and temperature dependent…at sub-freezing temps, how much change in range?
Your “… it’s BS” comment has as much science/credibility behind it as you would expect from a vested interest ‘Senior Editor’ of Green Vehicles as per your first link. You might as well referenced a statement also from Toyotas Marketing Department.
But I do still think your ADLittle paper actually looks to be a credible study - indeed I have referred it to my University Professor academic brother who regularly writes ‘environmental’ papers, and edits a peak academic environmental-focussed journal, to see what he thinks of the ADLittle papers academic substance.
I have a lay Automotive Engineers understanding of the protocols/conventions that apply to academically credible papers - thus I will get an expert opinion.
But still without debating the marginally environmental whole-of-life relativities of Petrol versus Electric, my point is, unless there is an environmental improvement of considerable magnitude (and not a debateable incremental advance, if anything), electric cars will remain little more than a political solution distraction, and a novelty ‘feel-good’ toy for buyers, until a real power solution comes along, with ‘hydrogen’ (Fuel Cells) easily the most promising at this point of time. Anything with an ideal world 200-250 mile range, and then needing overnight (or lengthy) recharging, remains a city day commuting vehicle, and not a serious automobile solution. Recently, (one real example) I had a long talk with a Singapore Taxi operator of a 5 year old Prius (great city-centre use for a Hybrid car), but since buying it new, he is now onto its fourth Battery Pack - forget the $s not covered by warranty for Taxi operation, but that’s really great for the environment, making and disposing of environmentally disastrous huge battery packs every 12-18 months. And I presume you have heard of all the Tesla new-battery problems, and their fix/storage/disposal problems.