Keith Morris wrote:
Would I be wrong to think that a fan unit attached to a drill press
spinning the unit while applying heat (heat gun) would change the
properties of the spinning fan.
Perhaps there’s a plan in there somewhere, but asking owners to
remove the fan clutch from the car, mount it in a drill press, spin
it at some specified rpm and apply a heat gun in order to determine
its condition is a bit much, don’t you think? I suspect that, even
if a procedure were developed, most would just buy a new fan clutch
instead.
Or just the starting properties of a hot or cold new unit (still bench
testing) while holding or hindering the blades (applying torque to
clutch).
I believe it’s the operation when hot that’s important to owners, so
any testing procedure should involve a fully warmed-up engine.
So, drive the car around until it’s warm, then shut it off, connect a
fish scale to the tip of one blade, and restart it. Read what the
fish scale indicates, a measurement of how much torque the fan clutch
is applying.
I have a couple of problems with this idea. First, it requires that
the owner have a fish scale, and it requires that he figure out how
to attach it to a blade tip. Second, I’m not sure the “stall torque”
of a fan clutch is a valid criteria; while I was inside a fan clutch
(I’ve had one of each type apart, the pix are posted somewhere I
think), it looked like the spinning of the clutch was necessary to
properly move the viscous fluid around to make it work. Third,
running the clutch stalled like that might actually damage it, or at
least affect its performance; like, it might get it too hot if done
for more than a few seconds. Fourth, I think it might be just a tad
dangerous if someone has something come loose while trying to measure
the torque with a fish scale while the engine is running.
Yeah, you could do the same type test on the bench instead, but I
still think a usable test must be done in situ. Taking the fan
clutch out is just too difficult. Besides, for all I know the clutch
must be mounted on a horizontal shaft to work right, mounting on a
vertical shaft may screw it up, cause all the fluid to collect in one
spot or another or some such.
If we could come up with a test method that a guy could do in his (or
her) garage I would gladly purchase a new fan clutch tomorrow and
measure both my old and new fan clutch.
To my mind, the use of the timing light is just about ideal. Can be
easily done with the fan and clutch in place, and the only tools
required are a timing light (which is pretty essential for setting
the timing as well, so owners should have one or know where to get
one) and a tach, and the tach is in the dash.
The only problem is that some baseline data must be collected in
order to interpret the results of the test. Anyone with the OEM belt-
driven fan setup and a timing light should be able to establish with
some accuracy at what engine rpm the fan looks like it’s stationary,
which means it’s turning at 1/2 crank rpm. The problem is that you
won’t know anything unless you know what engine rpm it SHOULD happen
at. If we could establish that and put it in the Book, others should
be able to test their fan clutches pretty easily.
What’d be really great is if someone could test a fan clutch that is
known to be faulty. I’d love to have that data point as well!
BTW, it might prove helpful to mark the fan blades with white-out or
some such to make them easier to see with the timing light.
Depending, of course, on whether you have the metal fan, the yellow
plastic fan, or the black plastic fan. And, oh, by the way: with any
data collected, we’d need to know which fan, and we’d need to know
which fan clutch – the 1-bolt or the 4-bolt.
I’ve 94K miles with the
original fan clutch and an engine that does not have cooling problems
Way back when, I replaced a fan clutch because I was convinced it
wasn’t working right. But I really didn’t know for sure. Later on,
Marty Sullivan was visiting me with his H&E, and on the way out of
here his fan clutch failed in a big way: the bearing broke inside the
fan clutch itself so the whole thing was wobbling around, vibrating
the whole car. He’s really lucky it didn’t fly off. So we removed
that unit and put my old one in and sent him on his way. I STILL
have no idea if that fan clutch was any good or not.
For all I know, 94K miles or more may be typical for one of these fan
clutches. Since a viable test procedure has never been established,
there have only been a handful of cases where a fan clutch has been
demonstrably defective – such as Marty’s, or the couple of cases
where an overheating problem definitely cleared up upon replacement.
It’s quite possible, probable even, that MOST of the fan clutches
that have been replaced over the years had nothing wrong with them,
the overheating was due to something else – Barr’s Leaks, tobacco in
the radiator fins, whatever – and the fan clutch was replaced as
part of a shotgun attempt at curing the overheating issues.
As you all know, the unanswerable question of whether the fan clutch
is working properly is one of the chief reasons I advocate throwing
the thing over the hedge and installing electric fans. It’s easy to
troubleshoot an electric fan. But if we came up with a viable,
repeatable test for the fan clutch, maybe I could back off of that
recommendation. I still think installing an electric fan is CHEAPER,
mine cost me $25, and I still think it’s better, but a verifiable fan
clutch would at least be acceptable. At present, I consider it
unacceptable that, six months after you pay Jaguar prices for a new
fan clutch, the only way to know for sure that it’s still working is
to pay Jaguar prices for ANOTHER new fan clutch.
– Kirbert
Visit the Jag Lovers homepage at http://www.jag-lovers.org for exciting services and resources including Photo Albums, Event Diary / Calendar, On Line Books and more !