[x300] Administrative Request

X300
1

Michael Brown,

Please use your administrator powers to return this list to the technical
discussion that it was meant to be. Please do not allow some people to use
it as a forum for wrongly arguing Constitutional points of law. I value
this list for the information it brings me about my hobby. I hope that you
will start editing it accordingly.

Thanks,

Louis

2

I think Louis’s request is appropriate. I also think it appropriate that
people have a limited opportunity to digest and react to what we have read
today.

So, threads involving what the policies of Jag-lovers should or should not
be are closed effective 12:01 am Greenwich Mean Time on Saturday 10 August
2002. If I count correctly, that’s about 4-1/2 hours from now.

Michael Brown
X300 List Administrator-----Original Message-----
From: Louis Georgalas [mailto:lgeorgalas@austin.rr.com]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 2:20 PM
To: x300-digest@jag-lovers.org
Subject: [x300] Administrative Request

Michael Brown,

Please use your administrator powers to return this list to the technical
discussion that it was meant to be. Please do not allow some people to use
it as a forum for wrongly arguing Constitutional points of law. I value
this list for the information it brings me about my hobby. I hope that you
will start editing it accordingly.

Thanks,

Louis

This message has been sent from a law firm and may contain information which is confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message and any attachments without retaining a copy. Thank you.

3

Whose constitution? Jaguars are made in Britain and are subject to
British law.

Andrew UK-----Original Message-----
From: owner-x300@jag-lovers.org [mailto:owner-x300@jag-lovers.org] On
Behalf Of Louis Georgalas
Sent: 09 August 2002 19:20
To: x300-digest@jag-lovers.org
Subject: [x300] Administrative Request

Michael Brown,

Please use your administrator powers to return this list to the
technical
discussion that it was meant to be. Please do not allow some people to
use
it as a forum for wrongly arguing Constitutional points of law. I value
this list for the information it brings me about my hobby. I hope that
you
will start editing it accordingly.

Thanks,

Louis

4

Well Michael,

I can assure you as of 12:01 am Greenwich Mean Time on Saturday 10 August
2002. my lips are sealed, my voice is silenced, my spirit is broken. You
command and I bow before you, But I seethe within.

Ford Prestige Vehicle Group must be so proud of you.

James Lyons
98 V8 3.2
Manchester UK

5

Why not suggest instead that this discussion be took to the policy list? Maybe when the time has run out you could just forward e-mails in this thread to the policy list. That would be more appropriate than just declaring it a dead subject. Since it comes up in some form annually it
is obviously not a dead subject and should be allowed, in the appropriate forum, to be discussed until nobody is interested in it anymore or a consensus is reached.

Tom Souther
Concerned Member (Obviously with no rights whatsoever)

“Brown, Michael H.” wrote:> I think Louis’s request is appropriate. I also think it appropriate that

people have a limited opportunity to digest and react to what we have read
today.

So, threads involving what the policies of Jag-lovers should or should not
be are closed effective 12:01 am Greenwich Mean Time on Saturday 10 August
2002. If I count correctly, that’s about 4-1/2 hours from now.

Michael Brown
X300 List Administrator

-----Original Message-----
From: Louis Georgalas [mailto:lgeorgalas@austin.rr.com]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 2:20 PM
To: x300-digest@jag-lovers.org
Subject: [x300] Administrative Request

Michael Brown,

Please use your administrator powers to return this list to the technical
discussion that it was meant to be. Please do not allow some people to use
it as a forum for wrongly arguing Constitutional points of law. I value
this list for the information it brings me about my hobby. I hope that you
will start editing it accordingly.

Thanks,

Louis

This message has been sent from a law firm and may contain information which is confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message and any attachments without retaining a copy. Thank you.

6

Michael,

In the new, touchy-feely, everything in the garden’s lovely X300 list,
would it be apposite to ask precisely how list admins are appointed? I
don’t recall seeing any democracy involved. This must surely place the
lists at risk of law suits from disaffected members?

Andrew UK

(It’s not 1200 GMT Saturday yet, before you get too excited)-----Original Message-----
From: owner-x300@jag-lovers.org [mailto:owner-x300@jag-lovers.org] On
Behalf Of Brown, Michael H.
Sent: 09 August 2002 19:31
To: ‘Louis Georgalas’; x300-digest@jag-lovers.org
Subject: RE: [x300] Administrative Request

I think Louis’s request is appropriate. I also think it appropriate
that
people have a limited opportunity to digest and react to what we have
read
today.

So, threads involving what the policies of Jag-lovers should or should
not
be are closed effective 12:01 am Greenwich Mean Time on Saturday 10
August
2002. If I count correctly, that’s about 4-1/2 hours from now.

Michael Brown
X300 List Administrator

-----Original Message-----
From: Louis Georgalas [mailto:lgeorgalas@austin.rr.com]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 2:20 PM
To: x300-digest@jag-lovers.org
Subject: [x300] Administrative Request

Michael Brown,

Please use your administrator powers to return this list to the
technical
discussion that it was meant to be. Please do not allow some people to
use
it as a forum for wrongly arguing Constitutional points of law. I value
this list for the information it brings me about my hobby. I hope that
you
will start editing it accordingly.

Thanks,

Louis

This message has been sent from a law firm and may contain information
which is confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and
delete this message and any attachments without retaining a copy. Thank
you.

7

There’s always the alt.autos.jaguar newsgroup.

Tim
1995 XJROn 8/9/02 12:35 PM, “James Lyons” jameslyons@ukgateway.net wrote:

Well Michael,

I can assure you as of 12:01 am Greenwich Mean Time on Saturday 10 August
2002. my lips are sealed, my voice is silenced, my spirit is broken. You
command and I bow before you, But I seethe within.

Ford Prestige Vehicle Group must be so proud of you.

James Lyons
98 V8 3.2
Manchester UK

8

How about a democratic vote on:

A) ending this topic immediately and
B) unsubscribing the next “disaffected member” who threatens the list

I vote YES for both.

Jim Reminga
98 XJ8
57 XK-140 OTS-----Original Message-----
From: owner-x300@jag-lovers.org [mailto:owner-x300@jag-lovers.org]On
Behalf Of Andrew Thomas
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 3:49 PM
To: ‘Brown, Michael H.’; ‘Louis Georgalas’; x300-digest@jag-lovers.org
Subject: RE: [x300] Administrative Request

Michael,

In the new, touchy-feely, everything in the garden’s lovely X300 list,
would it be apposite to ask precisely how list admins are appointed? I
don’t recall seeing any democracy involved. This must surely place the
lists at risk of law suits from disaffected members?

Andrew UK

(It’s not 1200 GMT Saturday yet, before you get too excited)

9

Not that anybody should threaten the list in any manner, you obviously
have not noticed that this is not a democracy.

Tom Souther

Jim Reminga wrote:> How about a democratic vote on:

A) ending this topic immediately and
B) unsubscribing the next “disaffected member” who threatens the list

I vote YES for both.

Jim Reminga
98 XJ8
57 XK-140 OTS

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-x300@jag-lovers.org [mailto:owner-x300@jag-lovers.org]On
Behalf Of Andrew Thomas
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 3:49 PM
To: ‘Brown, Michael H.’; ‘Louis Georgalas’; x300-digest@jag-lovers.org
Subject: RE: [x300] Administrative Request

Michael,

In the new, touchy-feely, everything in the garden’s lovely X300 list,
would it be apposite to ask precisely how list admins are appointed? I
don’t recall seeing any democracy involved. This must surely place the
lists at risk of law suits from disaffected members?

Andrew UK

(It’s not 1200 GMT Saturday yet, before you get too excited)

–
Advice is a Dangerous Gift,
Even from the wise to the wise.
-Tolkien, Lord of the Rings

10

Osama bin Laden would be proud of you - Agree with me or get “removed”.

Andrew UK-----Original Message-----
From: owner-x300@jag-lovers.org [mailto:owner-x300@jag-lovers.org] On
Behalf Of Jim Reminga
Sent: 09 August 2002 21:11
To: x300@jag-lovers.org
Subject: RE: [x300] Administrative Request

How about a democratic vote on:

A) ending this topic immediately and
B) unsubscribing the next “disaffected member” who threatens the list

I vote YES for both.

Jim Reminga
98 XJ8
57 XK-140 OTS

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-x300@jag-lovers.org [mailto:owner-x300@jag-lovers.org]On
Behalf Of Andrew Thomas
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 3:49 PM
To: ‘Brown, Michael H.’; ‘Louis Georgalas’; x300-digest@jag-lovers.org
Subject: RE: [x300] Administrative Request

Michael,

In the new, touchy-feely, everything in the garden’s lovely X300 list,
would it be apposite to ask precisely how list admins are appointed? I
don’t recall seeing any democracy involved. This must surely place the
lists at risk of law suits from disaffected members?

Andrew UK

(It’s not 1200 GMT Saturday yet, before you get too excited)

11

keep going… this way nobody will miss you !----- Original Message -----
From: “Andrew Thomas” drspinola@atlas.co.uk
To: jreminga@develcorp.com; x300@jag-lovers.org
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 5:17 PM
Subject: RE: [x300] Administrative Request

Osama bin Laden would be proud of you - Agree with me or get “removed”.

Andrew UK

12

Before I go, I’d still appreciate a reply to my query as to how admins
get appointed. Do you have to work in Ford’s PR department?

Andrew UK-----Original Message-----
From: owner-x300@jag-lovers.org [mailto:owner-x300@jag-lovers.org] On
Behalf Of Andrew Thomas
Sent: 09 August 2002 20:49
To: ‘Brown, Michael H.’; ‘Louis Georgalas’; x300-digest@jag-lovers.org
Subject: RE: [x300] Administrative Request

Michael,

In the new, touchy-feely, everything in the garden’s lovely X300 list,
would it be apposite to ask precisely how list admins are appointed? I
don’t recall seeing any democracy involved. This must surely place the
lists at risk of law suits from disaffected members?

Andrew UK

(It’s not 1200 GMT Saturday yet, before you get too excited)

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-x300@jag-lovers.org [mailto:owner-x300@jag-lovers.org] On
Behalf Of Brown, Michael H.
Sent: 09 August 2002 19:31
To: ‘Louis Georgalas’; x300-digest@jag-lovers.org
Subject: RE: [x300] Administrative Request

I think Louis’s request is appropriate. I also think it appropriate
that
people have a limited opportunity to digest and react to what we have
read
today.

So, threads involving what the policies of Jag-lovers should or should
not
be are closed effective 12:01 am Greenwich Mean Time on Saturday 10
August
2002. If I count correctly, that’s about 4-1/2 hours from now.

Michael Brown
X300 List Administrator

-----Original Message-----
From: Louis Georgalas [mailto:lgeorgalas@austin.rr.com]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 2:20 PM
To: x300-digest@jag-lovers.org
Subject: [x300] Administrative Request

Michael Brown,

Please use your administrator powers to return this list to the
technical
discussion that it was meant to be. Please do not allow some people to
use
it as a forum for wrongly arguing Constitutional points of law. I value
this list for the information it brings me about my hobby. I hope that
you
will start editing it accordingly.

Thanks,

Louis

This message has been sent from a law firm and may contain information
which is confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and
delete this message and any attachments without retaining a copy. Thank
you.

13

Hey guys and gals,

I think this is getting childish and is turning into “Clash of the Egos”

Why continue responding to someone you disagree with?

Why continue to disagree with the list admins?

I’m glad I don’t deal with some of you in real life if you conduct
yourselves like this behind the privacy of a home computer.

Would you be acting this way if all of us were face to face?

Pascal, etc, what value does yours or Andrew’s comments have for the rest of
us?

For what it’s worth, some of you that were highly regarded here are starting
to lose their shine.

Tim
1995 XJROn 8/9/02 2:44 PM, “Pascal Gademer” pascal@pam-trading.com wrote:

keep going… this way nobody will miss you !

----- Original Message -----
From: “Andrew Thomas” drspinola@atlas.co.uk
To: jreminga@develcorp.com; x300@jag-lovers.org
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 5:17 PM
Subject: RE: [x300] Administrative Request

Osama bin Laden would be proud of you - Agree with me or get “removed”.

Andrew UK

14

List administrators simply need to be “slow to anger and great in power.”

Michael is a much better list administrator than I would be. I would have
kicked in the power part about 5 emails ago.

Jim Reminga-----Original Message-----
From: owner-x300@jag-lovers.org [mailto:owner-x300@jag-lovers.org]On
Behalf Of Andrew Thomas
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 5:50 PM
To: ‘Andrew Thomas’; ‘Brown, Michael H.’; ‘Louis Georgalas’;
x300-digest@jag-lovers.org
Subject: RE: [x300] Administrative Request

Before I go, I’d still appreciate a reply to my query as to how admins
get appointed. Do you have to work in Ford’s PR department?

Andrew UK