[x300] More X300 Ebay mayham

In reply to a message from Earl Kiker sent Tue 30 Sep 2008:

That’s why he get’s the big bucks …err, our enduring gratitude.–
The original message included these comments:

Thank you Mark.
Earl Kiker

Until then no
more shrill generalizations of GM products or their use in
Jaguars. Limit
your comments to rational, unemotional, helpful posts on
issues with and
repair, maintenance, and enjoyment of your Jaguar.


XJeff 97 XJ6L
New Bern, NC, United States
–Posted using Jag-lovers JagFORUM [forums.jag-lovers.org]–
–Support Jag-lovers - Donate at http://www.jag-lovers.org/donate04.php

In reply to a message from Mark Stephenson sent Mon 29 Sep 2008:

First off, yes I do think seven cars out of millions is alot.
Because that is seven cars I’ve owned. That is 7 for 0 as far as
unreliable and reliable go. If you had seven cars from any
manufacturer that where lemons, would you respect for that company?

Second I took up your bluff and researched X300 ZF vs GM failures:

I found four GM problems and no ZF problems, that is 4 for 0 with
just a quick search. In fact, I could not find ONE thread with a 4
speed ZF failure on this forum.

1)http://forums.jag-lovers.org/avsn.php?1131752j11

2)http://forums.jag-lovers.org/avsn.php?1053816i06

3)http://forums.jag-lovers.org/avsn.php?1131058j54

Here is my favourite:
4)http://forums.jag-lovers.org/avsn.php?885219q13

Here a Blazer with just 70K on the clock is already experiancing
4L60E issues.
5)http://www.hotrodders.com/forum/no-4th-gear-4l60e-transmission-
133149.html

Another one:
6)http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/index.php?
showtopic=63095&mode=threaded

You think I’m being ‘‘emotional?’’ I’m sharing on opinion based on
fact and that is it.–
The original message included these comments:

And I have a 1999 S-10 Pickup with 105K miles that has run beautifully for 9
years without needing anything but regular maintenance. So what’s your
point? Do you think seven cars out of tens of millions over 20 years is a
statistically significant sample? Extrapolating from that nearly
infinitesimal sample size is beyond illogical. Your reality is not reality
any more than mine is for the vast majority of GM car and truck owners. I
think that point is pretty well proven every time you bring this up and get
little, if any, agreement.
This is a Jaguar forum, not a GM forum. If you want to do something
constructive to make your point, go through the archives and create a list
of reported 4L80E failures and a list of reported ZF autobox failures.


AJ16er
–Posted using Jag-lovers JagFORUM [forums.jag-lovers.org]–
–Support Jag-lovers - Donate at http://www.jag-lovers.org/donate04.php

In reply to a message from AJ16er sent Sat 27 Sep 2008:

Forgot one:

http://www.gmhightechperformance.com/tech/0601gm_chevy_silverado_tra
nsmission/index.html

Let me guess, you are going to try to have me ‘‘banned’’ for having
a different opinion, eh?–
AJ16er
–Posted using Jag-lovers JagFORUM [forums.jag-lovers.org]–
–Support Jag-lovers - Donate at http://www.jag-lovers.org/donate04.php

At 09:11 30-09-2008, you wrote:

In reply to a message from Mark Stephenson sent Mon 29 Sep 2008:

First off, yes I do think seven cars out of millions is alot.
Because that is seven cars I’ve owned. That is 7 for 0 as far as
unreliable and reliable go. If you had seven cars from any
manufacturer that where lemons, would you respect for that company?

I completely agree with your position, that GM transmissions are
unreliable, based on real world experience. I’ve stated here before
that I think that they’re junk and I still haven’t seen or heard
anything to change my mind. Only last weekend, I met up with a friend
who turned up in a rental car because his wife had confiscated his
Beemer while her SUV (2006 Suburban) was in the shop getting the
transmission repaired …again. This was their third Suburban and
the second transmission failure!! My wife had only one Suburban and
two failures before 65k miles so we would never consider buying another.

I have absolutely no personal experience of any Jags that have
suffered failures other what I’ve read on various forums but I do
know that failures do occur. The defenders of the position that GM
boxes are reliable are fond of quoting statistics which, as we all
know, are accurate only 50% of the time, and are no substitute for
standing in the rain on a Sunday evening at the side of the freeway
waiting for the tow truck to arrive :wink:

Gus

Its not your opinion, its your delivery. Certainly you are not blind to
this.

Its all very simple. Whenever the subject of anything “GM” comes along you
choose words so as to incite argument. This is so patently obvious that it
can’t be accidental.

Argument blocks effective exchange of opinions.

Blocking effective exchanges of opinion runs counter to the intent of this
discussion board.

That’s how I see it.

Cheers
Doug Dwyer
Longview Washington USA
1995 XJRFrom: “AJ16er” thad83@comcast.net

Let me guess, you are going to try to have me ‘‘banned’’ for having
a different opinion, eh?

Geeez, Gus…what in the world are you and your friends doing to wreck
these transmissions ?? You’re brutal !!

:slight_smile: :slight_smile:

Doug Dwyer
Longview Washington USA
1995 XJRFrom: “Gus Macintosh” gusmac1@altrionet.com

I completely agree with your position, that GM transmissions are
unreliable, based on real world experience. I’ve stated here before that I
think that they’re junk and I still haven’t seen or heard anything to
change my mind. Only last weekend, I met up with a friend who turned up in
a rental car because his wife had confiscated his Beemer while her SUV
(2006 Suburban) was in the shop getting the transmission repaired
…again. This was their third Suburban and the second transmission
failure!! My wife had only one Suburban and two failures before 65k miles
so we would never consider buying another.

and are no substitute for standing in the rain on a Sunday evening at the
side of the freeway waiting for the tow truck to arrive :wink:

In reply to a message from Doug Dwyer sent Tue 30 Sep 2008:

No, I am not going to suger coat that I hate gm with a passion. If
people like Earl Kiker can not handle that, I am sorry. I always
engage in civilized discussion, never agruements.

Oh yes, a lady driving her SUV to work is putting such severe
service on it…RIIIIGHT.

What about the Ford Crown Vic cabs that get pounded to the ground
day in/day out that still last 250K miles on original transmissions?–
The original message included these comments:

Its not your opinion, its your delivery. Certainly you are not blind to
this.
Its all very simple. Whenever the subject of anything ‘‘GM’’ comes along you
choose words so as to incite argument. This is so patently obvious that it
can’t be accidental.
Argument blocks effective exchange of opinions.
Blocking effective exchanges of opinion runs counter to the intent of this
discussion board.
That’s how I see it.
Cheers


AJ16er
–Posted using Jag-lovers JagFORUM [forums.jag-lovers.org]–
–Support Jag-lovers - Donate at http://www.jag-lovers.org/donate04.php

In reply to a message from XJeff sent Tue 30 Sep 2008:

He’s worth every penny (err, good wish) and I am proud to cite Mark
as my role model in ‘matters administrative’ - though he’ll hate me
for saying so!

Good call IMHO.

Pete–
The original message included these comments:

In reply to a message from Earl Kiker sent Tue 30 Sep 2008:
That’s why he get’s the big bucks …err, our enduring gratitude.


66 2+2, 68 OTS lump, 94 X300 Sovereign, 94 XJR Manual
Cambridge, United Kingdom
–Posted using Jag-lovers JagFORUM [forums.jag-lovers.org]–
–Support Jag-lovers - Donate at http://www.jag-lovers.org/donate04.php

I think your passionate take on the GM thing amputated your sense of humor !
:slight_smile:

Doug Dwyer
Longview Washington USA
1995 XJRFrom: “AJ16er” thad83@comcast.net

Oh yes, a lady driving her SUV to work is putting such severe
service on it…RIIIIGHT.

In reply to a message from AJ16er sent Mon 29 Sep 2008:

If we’re going to go in for product bashing, try this one.

This person supplies a product that one usually has to wait 9
months for. One doesn’t know what it is until it’s delivered nor,
what condition it will arrive in. There is no warranty/guarantee
with the product. It may last 30 minutes or, 100+ years. If it
does last, it will cost you a fortune to maintain. It’s a given
that the product will give you plenty of grief but, this ia
balanced by the pleasure that you may also get, along with said
grief. It will cause you many sleepless nights and, after all
that, most of us get another one because their better in pairs.–
http://www.jag-lovers.org/snaps/snap_view.php3?id=1195594467
–Posted using Jag-lovers JagFORUM [forums.jag-lovers.org]–
–Support Jag-lovers - Donate at http://www.jag-lovers.org/donate04.php

In reply to a message from gary breyer sent Tue 30 Sep 2008:

Just to add fuel to the fire:

Two small problems:

  1. There is a certain amount of skill in selecting a good used
    vechicle.

  2. Why are all of the critisims of gm based on the US experience. I
    hear tell that the mexican Beemers are not as good as the European
    ones.–
    NigelJK
    Stockport, United Kingdom
    –Posted using Jag-lovers JagFORUM [forums.jag-lovers.org]–
    –Support Jag-lovers - Donate at http://www.jag-lovers.org/donate04.php

In reply to a message from NigelJK sent Wed 1 Oct 2008:

It isn’t about selecting a used vehicle. It that gm cars are
simply not good cars, new or old. Did you read my post regarding
the countless issues I’ve experianced with new gm cars?

There are no Mexican BMWs, mayby you are referring to Mexicans
VWs? :slight_smile:

And the GM owned Opel is not on top of any quality surveys either.–
The original message included these comments:

  1. There is a certain amount of skill in selecting a good used
    vechicle.
  2. Why are all of the critisims of gm based on the US experience. I
    hear tell that the mexican Beemers are not as good as the European
    ones.


AJ16er
–Posted using Jag-lovers JagFORUM [forums.jag-lovers.org]–
–Support Jag-lovers - Donate at http://www.jag-lovers.org/donate04.php

Comments below…

First off, yes I do think seven cars out of millions is alot.
Because that is seven cars I’ve owned. That is 7 for 0 as far as
unreliable and reliable go. If you had seven cars from any
manufacturer that where lemons, would you respect for that company?<

No, but I wouldn’t be speaking as if my 100% failure rate is the failure
rate of GM transmissions as a whole. It isn’t. If it was even a tenth of
that GM would have been history decades ago. So your generalizations are
inaccurate at best. I would suggest that Jaguar’s Nikasil and tensioner
failure rates are much higher than GM transmission failures, based on the
posts here. Is that to say that GM tranny failures aren’t higher than
others, no. But that doesn’t make every GM product junk, which is the
illogical conclusion you are drawing. My single example disproves that
ridiculous generalization. Comparing GM’s tranny failure rate to Ford, has
no relevance to X3xx Jaguars, because X3xx’s don’t use Ford transmissions.

Second I took up your bluff and researched X300 ZF vs GM failures:

It wasn’t a bluff, I was attempting to get you to confront reality.

I found four GM problems and no ZF problems, that is 4 for 0 with
just a quick search. In fact, I could not find ONE thread with a 4
speed ZF failure on this forum.<

I don’t recall limiting the discussion to 4-speed ZFs. I was having you
compare GMs to all the ZFs used in Jaguars, which is appropriate to the
list.

Did you actually read these threads? You’ll recall that I asked you to
mention the final resolution. You didn’t, perhaps because it would undermine
you assertions.

1)http://forums.jag-lovers.org/avsn.php?1131752j11

Interesting. This once contains your comments on GM transmissions. There was
no solution mentioned, but there was a lot of speculation that it was the
wiring loom. The original poster was trying to determine if it was the
transmission before he spent $400 on the wiring loom. He mentioned that his
rear tranny mount was shot.

2)http://forums.jag-lovers.org/avsn.php?1053816i06

This guy rebuilt his transmission and still had the same faults. He then
read the archives and wondered if it was the wiring. Again, no final
resolution mentioned.

3)http://forums.jag-lovers.org/avsn.php?1131058j54

I really question whether you read these or just posted the hits from your
search. This is the same thread as your first example. So we’re down to 3
examples, two of which could very well have been wiring problems.

Here is my favourite:
4)http://forums.jag-lovers.org/avsn.php?885219q13<

If this is your favorite, then your examples are pretty weak. Here you have
a guy whose indy can’t figure out why a replacement external tranny sensor
he is replacing doesn’t fit. Again not a transmission failure and no
indication if he ever got it to fit. The conversation then morphed over to a
discussion of the 4L60E and comments about failures in Suburbans and
Blazers. It’s totally irrelevant to Jaguars. So I’m not sure how this proves
anything. In any case, the people commenting in this thread were capable of
maintaining some perspective.

Doug Dwyer (who’s in the automotive business) indicated “For every anecdotal
instance of 4L60E failure I can assure you that there
are a dozens of “never had a problem” instances as well…there’s one in my
family right now with 230K miles!”

John Pring, who had a 4L60E Blazer failure added, “But as a side note, the
700R4 (predecessor of the 4L60 and 4L60E) in my
oldest son’s S-10 pickup just “went south” at 308k miles. Truly a long and
useful life by anyone’s definition!”

Here a Blazer with just 70K on the clock is already experiancing 4L60E
issues.
5)http://www.hotrodders.com/forum/no-4th-gear-4l60e-transmission-133149.html

Don’t care about Blazers – off topic.

Another one:
6)http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/index.php? showtopic=63095&mode=threaded

Not a Jaguar – off topic.

You think I’m being ‘‘emotional?’’ I’m sharing on opinion based on fact and
that is it.

So far you have presented no definitive examples of GM transmission failures
in Jaguars from our archives. One was a duplicate thread; two were
indeterminate, but quite possibly the Jaguar wiring harness, not the
transmission, and the fourth was a bad sensor. In the meantime, having read
99.7% (est) of all posts made to the list, I know there have been number of
posts related to the failures of the sealed-for-life transmissions to the
point that even MB has recently begun recommending fluid changes at 60K mile
intervals. I’d send you back to the archives for more research, but based on
the thoroughness of this first attempt, and the fact that I had to review
everything that you didn’t read in the first place, it just means more work
for me. So please don’t.

I never admonish anyone without pointing out a direction for
self-improvement. Having facts does not preclude one from being emotional
about them. Death is a fact, but it is also emotional. However, one can
easily share an opinion without being emotional. If you have a hard time
imagining how that is possible, think Kwai Chang Caine (if you ever watched
Kung Fu). To the degree that you depart from his demeanor, to the degree
that you are unable to maintain perspective by generalizing that all of
anything is bad, to the degree that you are incapable of staying on the
topic of this list when you can’t make your point; you are being emotional
and shrill. That’s not just fact, it’s definitional – look them up
sometime. If Master Po was to advise you he would like say, “You must remove
the red fog of hate from your eyes, Grasshopper, and let the world through,
as it exists.”

So please, if you want to stay on the list, you are going to have to control
your emotions and stick to the subject which is X3xx Jaguars and their (not
any other car’s) transmissions. As Doug states so succinctly (unlike me) in
his post,

"Its all very simple. Whenever the subject of anything “GM” comes along you
choose words so as to incite argument. This is so patently obvious that it
can’t be accidental.

"Argument blocks effective exchange of opinions.

“Blocking effective exchanges of opinion runs counter to the intent of this
discussion board.”

It’s simple. Heed my warning or be banned.

As I requested in my last post, anyone who has anything else to say on this
subject, direct it to me, not the list. You’ll find my e-mail address,
below.

Mark Stephenson, X300 Admin
owner-x300@jag-lovers.org-----Original Message-----

In reply to a message from Mark Stephenson sent Wed 1 Oct 2008:

I know not all gm transmissions fail very early BUT like
I’ve said. I’ve had such bad experiences with gm cars in the
past, I don’t want anything to do with them.

This discussion was about X300s fitted with ZF 4speed
gearboxes VS ones fitted with GM units and comparing the
failures of each. So far I’ve read about and seen many many
gm failures, not ONE 4 speed ZF failure. I’m sure there is
one out there somewhere but it’s so rare it might as well be
zero. Go ahead, find me one ZF 4 speed failure on this site,
just one.

Yet YOU had to bring up the 5 speed ZF failure rate, the
Nikasil issue, and chain tensior issues into it to make your
‘‘point’’ that ‘‘hey gm isn’t the only company with failures.’’

You clearly do not understand the difference between a
problem area and just a low quality vehicle in general. A
problem area would be like the tensioner issue on early
X308s. The Nikasil issue was another classic problem area.
It started off as a great idea, coat engine cylinder with
this and they practically last forever. Jaguar or BMW didn’t
take into account people would dump cheap highly sulfuric
gas into their cars as well as drive short trips, destroying
the linings.

Now you explain how it is normal for a new car to have as
many problems as that 91 Oldsmobile I wrote about a few
posts back? Like paint on the whole car peeling at two years
old or the engine crankcase gasket going bad at just 35K?

What do you mean, ‘‘I don’t care about Blazers, it’s
off-topic?’’ Do you think I care care about Blazers? No way
Jose. I gave that link for you see just how good these
transmissions really are. What better way to examine it than
in it’s own application, a Chevy? This is the same 4L60E
transmission as in X300 cars, right? Even the die hard Chevy
fanboys are admitting it is a weak transmission (like
anything gm.)

First you tell me to show links, stats, and info to prove
my opinion, then you tell me it’s ‘‘off topic?’’ I did
confront reality and you seemed to not like it very much.

Whatever, honestly it isn’t my job to spoon feed
information to anyone. If you don’t believe me then go right
ahead and keep buying GM. When you’ll be stranded on the
side of the road, you might realize I was right. Some people
just have to learn the hard way.

And you have no right to ban me for speaking my opinion. I
didn’t insult or flame any fellow member, I didn’t curse and
I follow forum rules. I donated to this site in the past.–
The original message included these comments:

No, but I wouldn’t be speaking as if my 100% failure rate is the failure
rate of GM transmissions as a whole. It isn’t. If it was even a tenth of
that GM would have been history decades ago. So your generalizations are
inaccurate at best. I would suggest that Jaguar’s Nikasil and tensioner
failure rates are much higher than GM transmission failures, based on the
posts here. Is that to say that GM tranny failures aren’t higher than
others, no. But that doesn’t make every GM product junk, which is the
illogical conclusion you are drawing. My single example disproves that
ridiculous generalization. Comparing GM’s tranny failure rate to Ford, has
no relevance to X3xx Jaguars, because X3xx’s don’t use Ford transmissions.
Don’t care about Blazers – off topic.


AJ16er
–Posted using Jag-lovers JagFORUM [forums.jag-lovers.org]–
–Support Jag-lovers - Donate at http://www.jag-lovers.org/donate04.php

I don’t have any more time to devote to arguing with you about this. I did
ask everyone, including you, to take all further discussion of this topic
off-list. You didn’t. Understand this: As list administrator, I am a
benevolent dictator. I have the right to ban anyone at any time for any
reason. In these matters we grant no preference to donors. If you don’t
agree with that you can leave now.

Any more posts on this subject on list, and you’re history. Limit your
discussion of the 4L80E to their application in Jaguars, or you’re outta
here.

Mark Stephenson, X300 Admin
owner-x300@jag-lovers.org

And you have no right to ban me for speaking my opinion. I
didn’t insult or flame any fellow member, I didn’t curse and
I follow forum rules. I donated to this site in the past.–
The original message included these comments:

No, but I wouldn’t be speaking as if my 100% failure rate is the failure
rate of GM transmissions as a whole. It isn’t. If it was even a tenth of
that GM would have been history decades ago. So your generalizations are
inaccurate at best. I would suggest that Jaguar’s Nikasil and tensioner
failure rates are much higher than GM transmission failures, based on the
posts here. Is that to say that GM tranny failures aren’t higher than
others, no. But that doesn’t make every GM product junk, which is the
illogical conclusion you are drawing. My single example disproves that
ridiculous generalization. Comparing GM’s tranny failure rate to Ford, has
no relevance to X3xx Jaguars, because X3xx’s don’t use Ford transmissions.

Don’t care about Blazers – off topic.


AJ16er
–Posted using Jag-lovers JagFORUM [forums.jag-lovers.org]–
–Support Jag-lovers - Donate at http://www.jag-lovers.org/donate04.php

In reply to a message from Mark Stephenson sent Thu 2 Oct 2008:

If I may paraphrase, we’re all aware of your irrational
generalizations - Let it go !–
The original message included these comments:

I don’t have any more time to devote to arguing with you about this. I did
ask everyone, including you, to take all further discussion of this topic
off-list. You didn’t. Understand this: As list administrator, I am a
benevolent dictator. I have the right to ban anyone at any time for any
reason. In these matters we grant no preference to donors. If you don’t
agree with that you can leave now.
Any more posts on this subject on list, and you’re history. Limit your
discussion of the 4L80E to their application in Jaguars, or you’re outta
here.


XJeff 97 XJ6L
New Bern, NC, United States
–Posted using Jag-lovers JagFORUM [forums.jag-lovers.org]–
–Support Jag-lovers - Donate at http://www.jag-lovers.org/donate04.php

Is this the thread that wouldn’t die? Stick a fork in it. This thread is
dead. No more comments on the list by or about AJ16er’s estranged
relationship with GM. As long as he isn’t discussing GM and their
transmissions, except the 4L80E in Jaguar applications, AJ16er is a valued
member of the X3xx community and is accorded the same level of respect as
anyone else (except perhaps a former list member or two).

Post mortem comments will only serve to revive the hopefully now completely
dead.

Any more comments on this subject will result in the poster (any poster)
being banned.

Mark Stephenson, X300 Admin
owner-x300@jag-lovers.org