A few hours ago MotorWeek posted a video on YouTube from 1987. They love the XJ-S. Search for MotorWeek retro review jaguar XJS to find it
// please trim quoted text to context onlySent from my iPhone
Excellent, thanks for sharing
A few hours ago MotorWeek posted a video on YouTube from 1987. They love the XJ-S. Search for MotorWeek retro review jaguar XJS
// please trim quoted text to context only
In reply to a message from A.J. Simpson sent Wed 22 Apr 2015:
great vid, iv been after a used sun roof for quite a while,
its revitalized my interest.–
The original message included these comments:
A few hours ago MotorWeek posted a video on YouTube from 1987. They love the XJ-S. Search for MotorWeek retro review jaguar XJS
// please trim quoted text to context only
–
gmt480
–Posted using Jag-lovers JagFORUM [forums.jag-lovers.org]–
–Support Jag-lovers - Donate at http://www.jag-lovers.org/donate04.php –
// please trim quoted text to context only
In reply to a message from John sent Tue 21 Apr 2015:
It’s nice to know my XJS wasn’t universally hated…:-)–
Dan Sater /69’ XKE 2+2 / 85’ XJ-S V12 5.3 HE / 2007 XK
Bonita Springs/Florida, United States
–Posted using Jag-lovers JagFORUM [forums.jag-lovers.org]–
–Support Jag-lovers - Donate at http://www.jag-lovers.org/donate04.php –
// please trim quoted text to context only
In reply to a message from Lost Dogs sent Thu 23 Apr 2015:
Don’t remember the last time I saw a Motorweek that ripped into any
make or brand.
They always seem so polite, even when they want to be negative.
Has Motorweek ever posted a scathing review for any car?–
1996 XJS 2+2 Convertible with 4.0L AJ16
–Posted using Jag-lovers JagFORUM [forums.jag-lovers.org]–
–Support Jag-lovers - Donate at http://www.jag-lovers.org/donate04.php –
// please trim quoted text to context only
Don’t remember the last time I saw a Motorweek that ripped into any
make or brand.
Yeah, they’re sort of a look-at-the-bright-side sort of rag, aren’t
they? Kinda like listening to the judges on the Voice prattle on
after a performance, they ALWAYS say the performance was excellent.
Makes the entire exercise pointless.
Was it Car & Driver that used to rip into cars? I remember one
famous review of a Mustang wherein the reviewers not only reamed Ford
a new one for a bunch of lousy stuff, but pointing out that the lousy
stuff was inexcusable since it was outdated, nobody should still be
doing it. They didn’t get a chance to review any Mustangs for three
years after that. When they finally did, in the course of a
comparison test between several competing models, they figured out
why: Ford hadn’t fixed a THING over the three years, the lousy stuff
was still there!
– Kirbert
// please trim quoted text to context onlyOn 23 Apr 2015 at 10:45, Veekay wrote:
In reply to a message from Kirbert sent Thu 23 Apr 2015:
I love those watching those retro reviews.–
1987 Jaguar XJS V12
Escondido, CA, United States
–Posted using Jag-lovers JagFORUM [forums.jag-lovers.org]–
–Support Jag-lovers - Donate at http://www.jag-lovers.org/donate04.php –
// please trim quoted text to context only