I am swapping engines between two car´s (don´t ask) and evaluating an XJ 4.2 engine. The engine is hardly run-in and the main bearings look like this (see picture).
Is there a maker’s mark or part number on back? I’m wondering if that is how they looked when they were new, some sort of witness mark from a manufacturing process, maybe from plating. The only way you have oil flow is when the crankshaft turns, and there’s no way you could get that entirely transverse erosion pattern with a running engine.
Looks like the same mark on the back. Can you actually feel a recess or erosion? Since it’s on both the front and back, it looks more like a stain than erosion. There’s no way anything significant leaks out between the bearing shell and block. Looks like they were dipped. I don’t think you can come up with any scenario where oil flow from a running engine can cause these transverse stains.
And there CANNOT be excessive flow out that path unless there is a significant SPACE there. It does not appear to me there is any more space at those points than anywhere else (perhaps a few 0.0001" at best).
Thanks Ray,
I thought, mayby the crankshaft is machined for +10 and I did not measure correct and installed STD bearings. I only have a vernier caliper available.
Regards,
Hedde