Hey, I actually loved the flip-up “flounder” headlights on those models … as well as being that it was the fastest U.S. production car at the time (or at least the most HP ?). But you’re right, the back end of the car looked more like an AMC Pacer or something than a Porsche
Hey, I liked that model of Porsche, too, Kirby and hoped back then I could somehow own one (esp. the 6 cyl. version), but the price on them just was too steep … despite being “ugly”
So what about the claim that the fuel crunch was the reason behind the XJ-S not being so popular in the '70s? Also, if it was not a sports car but a “Grand Luxury Tourer”, as claimed, did it not have the initials “GT” somewhere in the name - e.g. X-GT, XJS-GT, etc.? Always thought the “S” was for “sports (car)”, too …
Kirbert
(Author of the Book, former owner of an '83 XJ-S H.E.)
25
Well, the car was introduced pretty much right when the oil crisis hit. Unfortunate timing. Perhaps the bigger issue, though, was that much of the public was anxiously waiting to see what Jaguar would do to follow up on the E-type, and the XJ-S was a serious disappointment in that regard. First off, it was aimed at the luxury market rather than the performance market, which is actually a completely different market. Those who had been waiting to buy “the next E-type” turned elsewhere, not a one of them was interested in an XJ-S. Meanwhile, the people who would be interested in an XJ-S needed to be attracted to the showrooms, as they hadn’t been following Jaguar’s foibles.
It surprised me when Checker went out of business. …I published "Taxicab Scrapbook " in 1979…researched a lot about Checker…corresponded with the late David Markin son of founder.
I assumed the floor plan of the saloons would be bigger than that of the XJS.
I wouldn’t have said floorpan, that’s just some bent sheets of metal you bolt the seats to. In todays parlance it was more like platform engineering. Having worked on a SI XJ6, and owned a SIII XJ6 and XJ12, there are a large number of similarities and crossover parts in the running gear compared to an early XJ-S. The whole of the rear axle subframe is the same, the front suspension and brakes are the same, only the spring rates are different.
And that platform engineering continued under Ford ownership with the XJ-S being the base that the Aston Martin DB7 was built on. My XJR-S has lowered DB7 springs.
Most cars from the 70s and 80s were ugly (so were clothes!).
Only a few have aged well. The XJS is one of them!
Timeisrelative
(Jason Miller 1993 XJS 4.0 convertible, 1997 XK8 coupe )
30
I look at those “quizes” or whatever you want to call them,and I’ve found that most of them have to be written by 18 or so year olds that are just putting stuff down to feel like they know stuff. I was looking at one yesterday that was “what was the most popular Halloween costume on the year you were born” needless to say I had to disagree with the majority of them. Several times I have gotten partway through one and closed it because of how completely wrong they were on stuff. However, I will say I still like the 928, and miss the clothes of the 80’s lol
Amen, Greg. I always think of the '80s as the “armpit” of two things - car styling and rock music. The cars that decade just seemed to all look alike, or just “plain”. After the millennial change, cars started to make a comeback as to “individuality”, IMHO.
Timeisrelative
(Jason Miller 1993 XJS 4.0 convertible, 1997 XK8 coupe )
34
Some book dealers on intnet have some…sold out years ago…was sold by Hemmings and Motorbooks Int…an acquaintance of mine took the concept and produced a larger actually better book THE AMERICAN TAXI by Merkel and Monier…they credited me for the idea…of course this book came out some years after mine.