You are the first person I have seen post that their radius
arms were equipped with the brackets for the sway bar
links. I have not seen this on the XJS except for the
earliest models (1970’s) for which this was standard.
Late 70’s/early 80’s Jaguar deleted the rear bar altogether, and
deleted the attachment points. Sometime in the early 90’s Jaguar
added the rear bar back in on SOME models (Sportspak, etc.). Since
the attachment points would be necessary on these cars, perhaps they
added them back on ALL the trailing arms. That’s what I woulda done
if I were Jaguar, as it’s simpler than trying to keep track of which
cars on the assembly line get which trailing arms.
The OEM bar is pretty thin, but probably does just about
right, especially if you have the OEM bar in front.
It is pretty thin as anti-roll bars go, but it works wonders on this
softly-sprung car. Others go with the much, much, MUCH heavier bar
offered by Addco. That’s where things get complicated by the
trailing arm bushings. On most cars, the rear anti-sway bar is
connected directly to the rear swingarms with only a minimal amount
of rubber bushings. But on the XJ-S, the anti-sway bar attaches to
the trailing arm, and the trailing arm attaches to the rear swingarms
with a big, soft, cushy rubber bushing. Hence, you put on that
massive anti-sway bar and it doesn’t seem to do much because the
trailing arm bushings are absorbing its action.
If you just want a more stable drive for the street, go with the
light rear bar. If you want more than that, replace the bushings at
the REAR end of the trailing arms with poly. Only if you want
competition stiffness would I recommend the Addco bar, and I’d
suggest the poly bushings along with it.
Note that some have reported that, for competition, they take the
rear bars OUT. I’ve driven street cars with and without and it’s
difficult to imagine without being competitive, but they put really
stiff bars at the front and are free to adjust tire pressures and
even tire sizes to achieve the balance they need. On cars without
powr-lok in the diff, a rear bar can cause lifting and spinning of
the inside rear tire in a turn, but this car has powr-lok so that
shouldn’t be an issue.
I run the Addco front and rear bars, and had to craft
brackets for mounting the rear links. Was easier to do
than I expected.
Yeah, I did that, too. Really easy. I handed it to a welder and he
managed to weld them on without even removing the nearby rubber
bushings. If the bushings had been damaged I had planned to push
them out and install new, but I ended up not having to.
Poly helps, too, on the front end. On the rear, I think it
makes more sense to spend time locating that cage and
locking down the fore and aft movement.
Of course, the FIRST order of business is to lock down the steering
rack with aftermarket bushings – unless you have the OEM Sportspak
steering rack bushings. But yeah, it helps to remember that Jaguar’s
objective was a world-class ride, not performance. If you’re more
interested in driving enjoyment, judicious use of poly bushings is
warranted.
Personally, I chose to keep the OEM spring rates and shock
valving (well controlled but far from stiff), and then
increase the roll stiffness with the front and rear bars,
and add some poly to the front suspension.
I wholeheartedly agree with that scheme. I’ve even heard of racing
teams that go for soft springs and stiff anti-roll bars as a general
policy. And I’ve watched racing teams lose races because their
springs were too stiff.
In addition to the poly in the front, I would suggest poly at the
rear end of the rear trailing arms.
– Kirbert
// please trim quoted text to context onlyOn 7 May 2015 at 6:07, mike90 wrote: